science

Sample Report

This is a preview using fictional data. Real values are blurred. Create an account to generate yours.

Executive Summary

Overview of the settlement distribution and key metrics

Net Asset Pool
$583,000
Division
42.0% / 58.0%
Emma / Ex-Husband
Equalisation
$190,640
Emma pays Ex-Husband

Based on a total net pool of $583,000, the proposed division is 42.0% to Emma and 58.0% to Ex-Husband. To achieve this, $190,640 from Emma to Ex-Husband, assuming each party retains assets currently in their name.

Emma's Share

42%
$244,860

Ex-Husband's Share

58%
$338,140

Position Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of each party's financial position

lock

Position comparison included in your report

See exactly where each party stands financially

Get My Report

Assessment of Contributions

Detailed breakdown of contribution adjustments under s 79 Family Law Act

balance

Detailed contribution scoring

See how each factor affects your estimated split

Get My Report
description

Assessment Summary

Plain-language explanation of the primary drivers of this assessment

trending_down

Overall Assessment

This assessment suggests an adjustment of -8.0% in Ex-Husband's favour.

analytics Sensitivity range: -19.0% to 3.0%

list Primary Drivers of This Assessment

1
-3.2% Financial Contributions

Workforce participation: Client 67% (4.0 years out), Partner 100% (0.0 years out)

2
-2.2% Initial Contributions

Client brought 43% of initial assets ($58,000 vs $78,000)

3
+2.0% Future Needs

Future earning capacity: Client moderate, Partner strong (s 75(2)(b))

4
-1.6% Financial Contributions

Income split: Client 34% ($65,000), Partner 66% ($125,000)

5
-1.6% Non-Financial Contributions

Homemaker responsibility: 30% Client / 70% Partner

info 2 additional factors considered. See detailed breakdown above for complete analysis.

Net Effect

Based on the factors above, Ex-Husband is recommended to receive a 58.0% share of the asset pool, with Emma receiving 42.0%.

Negotiation range: This base recommendation has a sensitivity range of -19.0% to 3.0%, reflecting different weighting interpretations that may be argued in court or negotiation.

verified This summary is auto-generated from factual inputs using algorithm vv1.0 aligned with Family Law Act 1975 s 79 and s 75(2).

Asset Pool Analysis

Detailed breakdown of assets and superannuation

account_balance_wallet

Full asset and superannuation breakdown

Every asset, debt, and super fund itemised with recommended splits

Get My Report

Future Trajectory

Long-term income and retirement projections for both parties

show_chart

Income and retirement projections

See long-term financial trajectories for both parties

Get My Report

Settlement Pathway Comparison

Understanding the financial impact of different approaches to resolving your settlement

Comparing Your Options

There are different ways to reach a fair settlement. Here's how they compare on cost, time, and what you'll walk away with.

Collaborative

Agreement-focused, using Separately

Estimated Legal Cost: $1,750
Estimated Time Required: 3 months
Net Outcome:
$243,110

Negotiated

Moderate complexity, lawyer-assisted

Estimated Legal Cost: $18,948
Estimated Time Required: 12 months
Net Outcome:
$225,913
Best case: $230,285
Worst case: $221,540
$17,198 less than collaborative

Fully Litigated

Complex matters, court proceedings

Estimated Legal Cost: $46,640
Estimated Time Required: 24 months
Net Outcome:
$198,220
Best case: $209,880
Worst case: $186,560
$44,890 less than collaborative
lightbulb

A collaborative approach can make a real difference

By working towards agreement together, you could save $17,198–$44,890 in legal costs while still reaching a fair outcome grounded in Australian Family Law. Your recommended position ($42.0%) stays the same regardless of the path. The difference is how much goes to legal fees along the way.

Note: Costs based on typical Australian family law proceedings. Contested costs calculated as percentage of asset pool ($583,000). Time estimates are averages; actual duration varies by case complexity and cooperation level.



menu_book Glossary

Addback
When a court "adds back" money that was wasted or deliberately dissipated by one party, treating it as though it still exists in the asset pool for the purpose of calculating the split.
Asset Pool
The total value of all assets owned by both parties (including joint assets), minus all debts. This is the pool that gets divided between the parties.
Cash Adjustment
A lump sum payment from one party to the other to achieve the target split. Required when the current ownership of assets doesn't match the calculated fair division.
Contribution Percentage
The adjustment to a 50/50 baseline split based on each party's financial contributions, non-financial contributions, and future needs. A positive adjustment favours the client.
De Facto Relationship
A couple who live together on a genuine domestic basis but are not legally married. In Australia, de facto couples have similar property settlement rights under the Family Law Act after 2 years of cohabitation.
Dissipation
The wasteful or reckless spending of shared assets by one party, often after separation. Courts may "add back" dissipated funds to the asset pool.
Equalisation Payment
A payment from one party to the other to balance the division of assets so each party receives their calculated share. Same as Cash Adjustment.
Family Law Act 1975
The Commonwealth legislation governing divorce, property settlement, and parenting arrangements in Australia. Sections 79 and 75(2) are particularly relevant to property division.
Financial Contributions
Direct monetary contributions to the relationship, including income earned, assets brought into the relationship, inheritances, and gifts from family.
Future Needs
Factors the court considers under s 75(2) that may justify adjusting the split, including age, health, earning capacity, care of children, and financial resources.
Initial Contributions
Assets and financial resources each party brought into the relationship at its commencement.
Net Asset Pool
The total value of all assets minus all debts across both parties. This is the starting pool that the percentage split is applied to.
Net Equity
The value of an asset minus any debt secured against it. For example, a property worth $800,000 with a $500,000 mortgage has net equity of $300,000.
Non-Financial Contributions
Contributions to the relationship that aren't directly monetary, including homemaking, childcare, renovations, and supporting the other party's career.
Ownership Split
The percentage of an asset currently owned by each party. This differs from the target split. The goal is to redistribute assets so each party reaches their target equity.
Post-Separation Contributions
Financial or non-financial contributions made by either party after the date of separation, such as mortgage payments, caring for children, or maintaining assets.
Preservation Age
The minimum age at which a person can access their superannuation savings. In Australia, this ranges from 55 to 60 depending on date of birth.
Splitting Order
A court order that splits a superannuation interest between the parties. The funds are transferred directly between super funds without being cashed out.
Superannuation
Australia's compulsory retirement savings system. Super is treated as property in family law proceedings and can be split between parties via a splitting order or flagging agreement.
Target Equity
The dollar amount each party should receive based on the calculated percentage split. Target Equity = Net Asset Pool × Party's Percentage.
Waste
Expenditure by one party that was reckless, negligent, or designed to reduce the asset pool available for division. Courts assess whether to add back wasted amounts.
Waste Scenarios
Three possible approaches to handling wasted assets: no addback (waste is ignored), partial addback (only clearly reckless waste is added back), and full addback (all waste is returned to the pool).
s 75(2) Factors
Section 75(2) of the Family Law Act lists factors the court must consider when deciding what is "just and equitable", including age, health, income, care of children, and the standard of living.
s 79
Section 79 of the Family Law Act gives the court power to alter the property interests of parties to a marriage. It requires the court to consider contributions and s 75(2) factors.

This report was generated by Separately on 21 March 2026.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Ready to see your own estimate?

Create an account and complete the guided assessment to receive a personalised property settlement estimate based on your actual situation.